Bo Gorcesky - Associated Content from Yahoo!

Showing posts with label movie review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie review. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

My Best Creatively Written #MovieReview articles on @squidoo

Seen any good movies lately? Read my reviews for some ideas

Creative_movie_reviews
http://www.squidoo.com/creatively-written-movie-review

I have created the latest lens on Squidoo that takes all of my best creative writing movie revies and compiles them all into one site, as oppossed to all of the seperate links on my Associated Content site.

 

You can check out the latest Squidoo lens on my movie reviews and creative writing by following the link

Monday, June 22, 2009

The Star Wars Saga (or how I watched every Star Wars film in 15 hours) a movie review

We came, we saw - we kicked it's ASS! Ah yes, it felt so accomplished that I did such a feat yesterday when I watched the entire Star Wars saga back to back to back. My initial planning came about this when I heard of the prequels coming about years ago, and with each commentary on the DVD it could be heard in Lucas' voice on how he someday hopeed fans would appreciate all six of the films out. Cause he accredits it as not being six tiny lil films, but one really big film. It's all about the rise, fall and redemption of Anakin Skywalker and his quest for power and what consequences came with it to have his soul saved But the films also have this similar touch of 'timeless storytelling" by borrowing aspects/stories and events all throughtou history, legends/myths, literature and film; Lucas took the films and serials that he loved as a kid and applied every sorta lil hint to all of the Star Wars films. Hardcore fans will notice all of the cross genres of other films and literature in the Saga, from Akira Kurosawa's samurai films, The Wizard of Oz, Pirate movies, Faust, Frankenstein , Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers serials and comic strips, Han Solo being that gunslinger hero of the Westerns, WWII dog fights news reels (in fact the X-Wing fighter pilot costume is the British WWII fighter pilot uniform with a few accessories attached), The Legend of King Arthur, The Birth of Jesus Christ, The Roman Empire, Film Noir Detective aspects, Sergio Leone's bounty hunter of The Man With No Name is Boba Fett, the vile underworld crime boss of gangster films is Jabba the Hutt, Emporer Palpatine looking at all fo the destruction from his New Death Star is like the Gods of Olympus examining all of the mortals' actions, The Mos Eisley Cantina is Rick's Place from Casablanca and A WHOLE LOT MORE!

So my judgement call Were all of the films together one giant "Star Wars" film? In my humble dork opinion - I'd say def not. I'm prob the biggest Star Wars geek that I know, and despite the fact that I watched each one of these films one after the other (excluding an hour and half break I took between Ep. II and III when I hadda get my car at Magnus', run to the post office and wait on the longest line and then dash home to make some spaghettios. But despite the fact that I watched them all one after another, I'd have to say that they are 2 Different Trilogies that together make up one story and both take place in the same galaxy, but I felt that I-III were that different feeling of IV-VI.

I guess the one main decision factor to make my choice was the Digital Age. With the majority of the prequels, Lucas gave up on his old ways and just decided, "fuck it- just make it up on a computer for me." and so they did. THe computer effects alone since Episode II (making it the first Digital Film ever) transcended the market and in the tradition of the Star Wars film, again changed the ways films were made. No longer did Lucas have to heavily rely on stop motion miniatures, puppets, plasticated sets and costumes or men in rubber masks - he just made it up on the computer. Well, Episode I did have some usage of puppets (such as Yoda) back then the computer effects JUST weren't were they needed to be. But afterwards, he's gone mad I tell ya. IN FACT, the animatics of the films of today were the finest computer graphics of twenty years ago. (For those of you who don't know what an animatic is, it's pretty much taking the storyboards for a film and plotting/acting them out to see how things will look when the more finalizing stages will come about) Anybody remember the hit 80's computer film Tron? Well, the finest graphics that Tron offered are now considered the sub par of today's animatics - so you can see how far we come and the computer graphics are ever changing every day with newer programs, faster processing speeds and more geeks willing to do more.

Aside from the digital age, the other major changing factor that I couldn't get over between the two sets was the actors and the acting. Okay, so Lucas just HAD TO direct all of his prequels, so that means the more classic films had better and different techniques to get out of their actors during Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. SO I've really been feeling Hayden Christiansen's over the top acting as of late, Samuel L and his purple lightsaber, the very sexy Natalie and the very cool Ewan McGregor. But I look at the classics and besides always rooting for Han Solo, my mind can only wonder on such things of "what ever happened to Billy Dee Williams ("Lando's not a system - he's a man") and Carrie Fisher?" And we all know that Marc Hamil went on to do the voice of the Joker on all of the Batman cartoons, but he was pretty much type casted after the trilogy.

But overall, I did really enjoy my dorky expereince. It started at 6:20 yesterday morning and I ended it at 9:30 last night. I've got my dork bragging rights, but I have no prob admitting to you how physically drained I was after just sitting on the couch all of that time analyzing and watching the films - nitpicking and examining every aspect to see if they would def look as one big film (which I believe is what the LOTR have absolutly no prob doing) two sets of three films or six tiny 2 hour films. I collected all of my mental data and I've give you all my theory/opinion at the top of the blog. But here is all of my supporting evidence (to primarily go along with the Digital Age/Different Acting Groups differential that I was speaking about)

A)Mr. Lucas has done everything that he could do that when he was making his prequels that he could to get them "hooked up" with his classical trilogy he'd made some generation earlier. I'd say his primary cause was inserting witty dialogue, sayings/suggestions and occurances that would trickle themselves all throughout the trilogy. Some people may accuse his actions of being cheap and reusing the same bits/techniques he'd done so well with 20 years ago. But we all know how he is trying to milk us dorks for every nickel and dime we got. So he threw in a lot of lil inside jokes to say and some things that the real fans would get and appreciate to help tie up all of the films for us. I'd primarily seen this by having one character say something in the prequels, which another character would same the thing int he sequels. He admits sometimes doing it for a joke and sometimes it makes a universal flow of continiity between all of the films that kinda makes this universal trickling flow of time through it all and still has that sense of 'timeless storytelling".There are also two common elements in each of the films: We'll always have someone to say, "I've got a bad feeling about this," and each film opens up with a space ship flying across the screen directly after the crawling Star Wars chapter text.; But;here is a list of those other occurances that I can think of off the top of my head:

I-

1)Qui Gon Jin trying to apply the "old Jedi mind trick"; we were always treated how well it worked on weak minded fools. Now all of that is thrown out of the window and we get a good lil laugh from Watto who says, "Mind tricks don't work on me, only money."

2)Anakin racing during the pod race of Boonta's Eve races through Beggar's Canyon. During Episode IV, Luke is in the war room and sitting next to Wedge whom complains about hitting the target on the Death Star is too small. Luke replies, "I used to hit Womp Rats in Beggar's Canyon in my T-16 back home - they can't be no more than five meters wide."

3)The Tusken Raider atop on the ledge trying to shoot any passing by pod racers and shooting at them, well that's the first thing we see of the Tusken Raiders in Episode IV when they're trying to shoot Luke as he's traveling by in his landspeeder in the Jundland Wastes.

4) When the boys first arrive in Mos Eisley, Qui Gon gives the similar speech that Obi-Wan gives Luke when they first arrive in Episode IV and say "Mos Eisley space port - you'll never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy."

5)Even though it's a cut scene, a very young Greedo is suppossed to have a cameo int he film.; Anakin crosses him and basically warns him of his dirty deeds and to foreshadow him being greased by Han Solo at the Cantina in Episode IV.

6)C-3P0 mutters something about space travel about how he's never done it before, but in all of the other films he's always complaining about it.

7)Guerrilla Gungan Warfare is just hwo the Ewoks beat the baddies in part VI.

II-

1)The scene at the bar has a few connections: We first off have Obi-Wan pulling the mind trick on the guy trying to sell him Star Wars cigarettes.We also have his quick Saber slinging skills that he does against Ponda Baba and Doctor Evazan ("we're wanted men-we have the death sentence on twelve systems...") inside the Cantina of Episode IV after the two guys are clearly showing how much they don't like Luke.

2) How Anakin loses his right hand because of his hot headed stubborness is just how Luke loses his right hand when not listening to Obi-Wan and Yoda's pleas during Episode V when he dashes off to face Vader. And it comes back again when he's fighting Vader during part VI and sees Vaders' right hand chopped off again and sees the smoldering wires. He knows he's a step closer to the dark side with each piece of humantiy he loses off of him.

3)Foreshadowing of Anakin turning into machine as his right hand is sealed inside the metal plate at the Geonosis droid makign factory.

4)On Kamino as the Fetts are trying to fly away, Jango runs into the back of the ship as the door of the Slave I is closing in on him. Well, Jango hits his head on the top and continues to run in. This was purposely done because there is a scene in Episode IV when a bunch of stormtroopers are trying to enter the room on the Death Star that the droids had selaed themselves off in. Well, one of the stormtroopers hits his head as the door is opening because he is too tall. And this scene has become such a cult hit, that through the various re-releases, they have now accented that sound effect when he hits his head on the door. And of course we all know that storm troopers are clones of Jango Fett and apparently there is a door hitting gene in him that Lucas had to do lol. Yes I know how extremely dorky this is, but you gotta ask yourself - "who's more the dorkier, the dork or the dork who insists a scene be created based on a film blooper his extra did 20 years ago"

5)Jet packing into trouble. A malfunctioning back pack gets Jango into trouble twice during this film once on Kamino and the other when the rhino creature runs him over on Geonosis. The malfunctioning back pack of Boba Fett when Han Solo accidentally hits it with a staff during part VI on Jabba's skiff in the Dune Sea is why he falls to his death into the Sarlacc monster where "he'll surely be digested over a 1,000 years"

6)Fetts are being pursued by Ob-Wan in the asteroid field and they think they killed off Obi-Wan, but he really parked his Jedi Starfighter on the back of an asteroid. This same bit is done in Empire Strikes Back when Solo parks the Millenium Falcon on the back of the Star Destroyer. When the Destroyer dumps all of it's garbage prior to light speed, Solo floats away with the trash. Boba Fett is able to hunt him down and follow him to Bespin only because he'd seen this trick before with his father.

7)Count Dooku has to save the Death Star plans, well we all know how big the Death Star plays; a bit part in the classic trilogy.

8)Thank the Maker! C-3P0 always says this in the classic trilogy, but it's not until we see Anakin and 3P0 see one anotehr for the first time again when they're reunited on Tatooine. 3P0 says, "The Maker!" so for now one whenever we hear the droid proclain his maker's greatness, he's unknownilgly blessing Darth Vader ;)

9)The Lars estate set was reconstructed for this film. We have the dining/kitchen area that we see in Part IV (along with Aunt Beru's blue milk) and we also see the garage area where Luke first discover's the holographic Leia message inside of R2.

10)Yet again 3P0 mutters something about space travel, but funny how much he hates it by the classic trilogy even though he had his mind erased by the end of III ;)

11)When Anakin and Obi-Wan enter the bar on Coruscant, Obi asks him, "why do I have the feeling you'll be the death of me?" Which is true when Anakin chops down in the old bastard in part IV.

12)Amidala's hair do at the fireplace in her bondage outfit his reminsicent to her daughter's in part IV.

13)The Clone's walkers are synominious with more advanced AT-AT's in Empire. The same goes for the Star Destroyers that you see fly off are just the lesser advanced Star Destroyers and Super Star Destroyers in the other classic trilogy.

III

1)"Your father was the best space pilot..." Obi Wan telling Luke about hsi father's actions during the Clone Wars in part IV are clearly seen right at the beg of this film;

2)Reconstruction of the Emporer's throne room in Part VI is seen where Palpatine is held captive on Grievious' ship. Palpatine is even sitting in the same chair as he slowly spins around to see Anakin adn Obi.

3)Palpatine tells Anakin to kill Dooku just like the Emporer urges Luke to "strike him down" in part VI.

4)Grievious breathing is just like how Vader breathes with his new appartus in the classic trilogy

5)Even though it was all cut, there was a whole sub plot about the Rebellion being born the same time that the Empire was. Mon Mothma was one of the main people behind it, and she was a main character in part VI as she was trying to destroy the second death star. "Many Bothan spies lost their lives delivering this information..."

6)When Palpatine first tells Anakin of his knowledge of the dark side, he senses how much Anakin wants to kill him. This is just how Palpatine treats Luke aboard his throne room in Part VI.

7)When Mace Windu is shocked and you can briefly see his skeleton, well that's the same of Vader getting shocked on part VI and you see his skeleton by the Emporer as well.

8)Amidala says, "I shouldn't have come," Luke says the same thing in part VI while he rides the Shuttle Tyderian with his friends and says, "I shouldn't have come, I'm endangering the mission."

9)As Amidala is dying, she mutters to Obi Wan "there is still good in him," again Luke says this line a few times to both Vader and Leia along the lines of "there's still good in you, I can sense the conflict."

10)Even though it was cut, there was suppossed to show a scene of Yoda escaping to Dagobah in his lil shuttle.

11)Reconstruction of the Tantive IV set - the rebel blokade runner is used by Bail Organa in this film, but it's Leia's ship at the beginning of part IV when it gets raided by Vader and "Vader's Fist" as they're searching for the death star plans.

12)Bail giving the droids over to Captain Antilles which is why c-3P0 talks about, "I don't know what he's talking about Master Luke, our last master was Captain Antilles," Which I can totally understand as far as the movies go but this whole thing would prob throw out the entire Droids animated series out of the window. THe droids cartoon was all about the adventures of C-3P0 and R2, 15 years before part IV. So unless they're saying they were giving to Captain Antilles, then 5 years later went from one various master to the next only to arrive back to Captain Antilles where they were mind wiped again?! Rubbish I say.

13)When Obi-Wan first appears on Grievious and crew at Utapau he says, "hello there," this goes along with Obi Wan first seeing R2 in the Jundland Wastes during part IV and he says, "Hello there, come here my little friend...oh he'll be alright."

14)When Obi-Wan gets done shooting Grievious to death he says, "how uncivilized," that's because he is trying to explain to Luke during part IV when he talks about the lightsaber being meant for a more civilized age.

15)Vader chopping off Mace Windu's hand at Palpatine's place is just like Luke lossing his hand at Bespin in Part V.

16)When Yoda is grabbing his chest feeling all of the Jedi die is just what Obi Wan does after Alderann blows up in Part IV and he says, "it's as if a hunderd voice cried out in terror and were suddenly ceased."

17)Reconstuction of the Star Destroyer set at the end of this film, this is pretty much the same set you'll see in part V which Vader likes to cruise around in called "the Executor" ;)

18)Cameo by Grand Moff Tarkin, at the end of the film - Palpatine and Vader are looking over the progress of teh Death Star. A funny looking guy walks over to them, and walks away. In part IV, Tarkin plays the quintessintial bad guy in the film who is all about harassing Leia and and just itching to blew up something with his new toy. Which Leia responds "Moff Tarkin, I thought I noticed your foul stench when I was brought aboard."

19)THe main ships that the Jedi and Clones primarily fly around in will eventually evolve into T.I.E fighters and X-Wings into the classic trilogy.

20)The Wookies swinging on vines and yelling like Tarzan on Kashyyk is the same thing that Chewbacca does during the Battle of Endor in part VI.

21)Obi storing himself aboard Amidala's ship is the same idea he has getting himself smuggled aboard on the Millenium Falcon in Part IV just before the ship is tractor beamed inside the Death Star. "They are alternatives to fighting"

22)Anakin proposes to Padme about conjoining themselves to rule the galaxy with his newfound power. Anakin does the same thing to Luke during episode V when he says, "we can rule the galaxy as father and son and end this bitter conflict."

23)Padme's hair right at the beginning of the film is again is a direct tribute to the Leia bun's in part IV.

IF ANYONE ELSE CAN THINK OF ANY OTHER OCCURANCES, PLEASE LET ME KNOW SO THAT THEY CAN BE POSTED HERE!

B)Mr. Lucas then had to adjust everything he did with the prequels to better meet up with his sequels that he made originally. SO on top of just re-editing and releasing the Special Editions to the original trilogy during the late 90's - he again changed around some things in his films to match up better with things he was saying in the prequels. But there are things that not even the special editing programs can fix, plot holes to say that no matter how you look at them - there's something fishy here. My theory is that Lucas never had this whole story planned out. I think he just wanted to milk us (the fans) even more by creating the prequels. Granted, I'm very thankful to get an insight into a time even "longer" ago to see the times of the old Republic and the ways of the Jedi, but I think this whole Anakin transcendance thing is full of shit. I'd heard rumors during while they made Empire Strikes Back, that the man inside the Vader costume (David Prowse) initially told Luke that "Ben is your father!" Not Vader, and it was still Luke's expression captured on film. But there is no clear written evidence, even in the initial shootting script for Empire, this whole piece of dialogue is omitted for secrecy purposes. Makign Vader the father makes it more gripping, but I just don't think Lucas had this all laid out like he says; I've read his original Star Wars script (and it was even a few drafts before final final completion) and there is def some dif things going on in here that don't match up with his story.

So it's these lil plot holes that all he can connect to is that when Luke accuses Ben to lying to him during part VI, Obi just says, "well, from a certain point of view." He totally changes the subject and tries to lay out what he can for us.I believe it's all consiparcy if you ask me.So that when we were treated to Episode I, more questions popped up.Why does Obi tell Luke to find Yoda, "he was the Jedi master who trained me," whereas it was really Qui-Gon? Well Lucas covered his tracks there to say Yoda trained everyone. But if Qui-Gon had found the secret of immortatlity, why couldn't he just train Luke as a ghost like he trained Obi-Wan to also find the secret of immortality betwen Episodes III and IV?! Or how's about when Luke asks about his father initially, Obi tells him that "when I first met your father, he was a space freighter," or something like that. Why not just say, well he was a lil kid my master wanted to train. Is that also from a certain point of view?! And now I have my new droid rant, like Lucas just HAD TO throw that in that 3P0 needs his mind wiped. So that should prob throw the animated series out the window as well. And if so - I want my money back for buying that 10 dollar dvd at Wal-Mart :( lol Or why does Leia say in her initial hologram, "you served my father during the Clone Wars..." Obi Wan didn't pull that shit, he was workign for the Jedi Council and Organa only gave him a suggestion not to go there or he'd die - c'mon now; OR how's about how the Hell does Leai remember so much about her mother if mom died about 1 minute after she was born?! "She was sad...."

Well, now that my rant is done with that, let us focus now on the numerous adjustments that Lucas had to pull off during his DVD release of the classic trilogy which would link up with his sequels and have a closer "visual" connecting piece (and sometimes that the computer technology of the later 90's couldn't have done what they do now) between all of them now:

IV

1)Jabba has been re-reanimted much better than his first special edition relase and now looks closer to a blend between the Jabba we see during Episode I and the Jabba we see in Episode VI.

1997 Special Edition

2004 DVD Edition

2)The Lightsabers have been re-fixed,shaped and re-lit a bit better to look closer to the original lightsabers in the prequels.

3)The animation of Luke's landspeeder with the crew riding back enters a lot better now into Mos Eisley.

4)Okay Han Solo vs. Greedo at the Cantina, "Yes - I bet you have!" Yes, you have seen this scene altered a bit through history with much dispute. Even Holden gets into it during Jay and Silent Bob strikes back. So let's retrace this scene through history:

i)In 1977, Greedo confronts Han and Han shoots him first. Which sets Solo up for a dirty ice pirate and has no problem being treacherous and immoral. Which makes him all the more better at the end of the film because he cares for Luke enough to forget the bounty on his head, and save his freind from peril.

ii)In the 1997 Special Edition release, even though Greedo's gun is directly pointed at Solo he fires his gun FIRST which bounces off at an angle. Then they use some shotty special effects at the time to computer-wise shift Han's head off to the right and then fire SECOND at Greedo. Now we no longer have that aspect of Han being dirty, but lucky (cause in my expereience there's no such thing as luck)

iii)FINALLY at the DVD release of the Special Edition, Greedo now fires just a HAIR BEFORE Han and again Han shoots SECOND. But now they've changed the unnaturual head nudge away from a laser shot, and they digitally shift his whole upper body away from the blast instead.

5)When Obi Wan is de-activating the tractor beam on the Death Star, it used to say the words "Power" and "Tractor Beam" on the label and it was the only time you could see English in the Star Wars films. But they don't use English in this Galaxy, so the proper Star Wars language (which is called Aurebesh)was put in it's place.

6)The Dianogah (yeah, that slippery tentacle thing in the garbage compactor on the Death Star) well it doesn't so much look like just a persecope with an eye attached on the front, but more like a quick moving sleak beast now.

7)Obi imitating the dreaded Krayt Dragon (you hardcore dorks will notice the skeleton of one when C-3P0 and R2 are shuffling out of their esacpe pod through the desert. Now, they have re-dubbed Obi imitating the dragon because the other recordigns sounded too much like a Dewback (those lizard things the stormtroopers rode on to look for the droids, y'know "Look sir, droids." )

V

1)When Vader initially wants to talk to the Emporer via the hologram, there's this really cheesy looking Emporer with a lot of plastic on his eyes and sounds like a voice actor of Scrapper (Clive Revell)from the Transformers. The original was played by a woman,1997 Special Edition and they thought she wasn't creepy enough so they super imposed these like chimpanzee eyes on her. Well, now it's been reshot using Ian McDirmind (2004 DVD Editionwho plays the Emporer in all of the other films besides part IV) and this is also where Palpatine informs Vader of his son being the one to blow up the Death Star. If you ever wanted that info before, you hadda get this cool Dark Horse Star Wars comic that tells you about how Vader captured this X-Wing pilot to get that info out of him and then Vader's Quest to find Luke.

2)All of Boba Fett's lines (which were initially supplied by Jason Wingreen) are now re-dubbed by Temeura Morrison to match up with Jango Fett's and have a constant flow of continuity between them. Personally, I prefered Boba's old kinda raspy and dying voice better

3)Luke no longer screams as he plummets down through the middle of Bespin. He does scream when he gets his hand cut off, but now he plummets with dignity into the bottomless abyss of Bespin and away from Vader.

4)At the end of the film when Vader is meeting up with his Imperial dignitaries, in all previous versions their insignias where on the wrong side of their unifroms. Well, now THANK GOD that Lucas adjusted to better fit our continuity problems - geez

VI-

1)Sebastian Shaw, who plays the much older Anakin when Vader requests to see Luke "with my own eyes," Sebastian looks much more pale and his eyebrows have been digitally erased since Anakin turned into a blackened marshmellow by the time of Episode III ended. They also digitally colored Shaw's eyes to match up with Hayden's.

2) In the Special Edition, they got rid of the hilarious Ewok song and now it's a more peaceful kinda. There are various shots across the universe of everyone celebrating the death of the emporer. The new one added to tie in with the prequels was Naboo, and you can hear a gunga (possiably Jar Jar?) saying "weesa free!"

3)When Luke sees the astral force forms of the old Masters Yoda and Obi Wan, actor Shaw is suppossed to appear as well. But he's now been replaced by Hayden just before his fight with Obi-Wan took place. Which makes sense that he should be honored before he went to the Dark Side, but whose to say Luke has ANY idea who that is next to Obi- Wan lol.

1997 Special Edition

2004 DVD Edition

4)Also during the celebration of the planets, the shots of Coruscant had been re-edited to now feature the Galatic Senate and Jedi Temple buildings in the background of shots.

And so, that is it for me. I'd like to give a very special thanks to my friends and family that tried to stick it out with me throughout the marathon. Especially to my sister Jolene whom not only told me that Return of the Jedi was her favorite, but she only didn't sit through Empire or the first 30 min's of Jedi - so Kudos to you Jolene!

And if you think this is the end, then you are wrong folks. I will be doing this agian, but more planned and with more people. I will also be inserting the Clone Wars animated series (because it too has lines and visuals that play throughout the saga), the animated piece of the Star Wars holiday special when Luke and the gang first meet Boba Fett and perhaps even the Ewoks films: Caravan of Courage and The Battle Of Endor

Thanks to everyone for participating, and May the Force be with you all -

Always.......

Your Dork Knight,

Bo

Judge Dredd, the most under rated super hero film of all time (movie review)

James "Bo" Gorcesky

Judge Dredd movie review

December 22, 2007

The Most Underrated Action/Adventure/Sci-Fi/Comic Book Film

Of All Time: Judge Dredd

http://s5.photobucket.com/albums/y197/thundrshot/?action=view&current=iamthelaw.jpg" target="_blank">..http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y197/thundrshot/iamthelaw.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

Why Judge Dredd is considered such an underrated cult comic book film to me? Well, first off let me stack it up against other cult comic book inspired films out there that can come to my mind: Flash Gordon, Conan the Barbarian, Daredevil, The Fantastic Four (the unreleased 1994 version), Howard the Duck, Superman III – what is one thing they all have in common? They primarily all had mixed reviews by the critics and the common fan base, they all had fairly weak box office sales, but most importantly, there were just a small element or two that caused the true die hard fans to create a cult following of that film. I am surprised to talk to some fans and would dare to utter such words as, "Oh c'mon, Daredevil wasn't that bad." Or, "Man, I can't wait for the unrated special collector's edition of Howard the Duck on high-def DVD!" But as these fans grow older, they are gathering in numbers on the internet and creating petitions to get their favorite films back out of film limbo, or are actually making the decisions in ..:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Hollywood to turn their favorite properties into movie franchises.

With that being said, and some of our other favorite cult films out of the way, I'd like the rest of this article to focus on the 1995's Judge Dredd directed by Danny Cannon and starring Sylvester Stallone, Diane Lane, Rob Schnieder and the legendary Max "please stop calling me Ming the Merciless" Von Sydow. Considering that this film was released by Walt Disney pictures, and was rated R (for what I am guessing is extremely ridiculous scenes of violence,) which probably hurt it's initial release. More often than not, you try to find a happy medium with the comic book fans with a PG-13 rating, so that way you can have some sexy stuff and some violence, but with some fun stuff for the kiddies as well. But Dredd, much like it's action packed Von Sydow predecessor Conan the Barbarian (which was also rated R and also brought to the screen thanks to Edward R. Pressman) will doom it's box office sales as too risqué.

The film did stir up enough excitement and reviews amongst the Sci-Fi fan base, as it was nominated for several Saturn Awards for it's excellent costume and makeup work. Which, I must say, I really like comic book films that make it look like they took a panel from a book and made it come to life like an Alex Ross painting. The Judge Dredd costume looks highly authentic to the pictures in the books, and you could almost feel the cheesy plastic on their helmets. But only using some eye catchy makeup and costume design work (that sometimes makes some of the costumes look like it came out of Masters of the Universe mixed with a Imperial Storm trooper) does not gratify enough success. Some might feel a similar connection to another cult Von Sydow film, Flash Gordon which was also praised for it's set and costume design, but hugely failed in the writing and acting department. But aside from the eye candy featurettes, the post apocalyptic city is just enough to get a few ooh's and aah's out of people and will shortly thereafter begin to chuckle at Stallone's cheesy one liners (I knew you'd say dat.)

Ah yes, Stallone. How fitting that the crooked lipped action hero should play a cop in the future – he has played a cop in nearly every other genre so far. How many films can you think of where Stallone has played a cop? I'll give you a few seconds then I'll just shoot off from memory………

Nighthawks

Cop Land

Demolition Man

Tango & Cash

Cobra

D-Tox

Daylight

Stop! Or my mom will shoot

Talk about being type cast right? Actually, Stallone's acting and tight lipped one liners and total devoid of humanity in his role as Judge Dredd earned him a Razzi Award for worst actor (a rather prestigious account since he was simultaneously nominated for worst actor in Assassins for the same year). But where Stallone fails, he has his much more sympathetic partner and romance Judge Hershey (played by Diane Lane) and Dredd's kooky and streetwise sidekick and comedy relief Rob Schneider. Oh, but do we need to mention that the villain in the film is the psychotic (and also a cloned twin brother) of Judge Dredd – RICO! Just hearing Stallone say "Rico" in his crooked lipped way is hilarious. With the aid of some dazzling sparkling blue matching contacts and oozing super Italian charm, Hollywood decided that Armand Assante would be the best choice for a Bizarro Judge Dredd.

Now that the acting is out of the way, let us try to focus on the story. The film itself underwent several changes. Stallone was such a spoiled little brat that kept demanding changes; supposedly the original shooting script and the finished product are two entirely separate entities. But to get to his roots, Judge Dredd is based on a late 70's action hero that was initially published in Britain in the book 2000 AD. In a desolate world, there is too much violence and crime, so society created "Judges" members that upheld THE LAW as Judge, Jury and rarely as Executioner. Their world is in a post apocalyptic setting, as much has been destroyed from nuclear bombings and Judgment day. Most of the world is covered in desolate wastelands, while others have come together to create huge towering mega-oplis called Mega City 1 (which stretches from about Baltimore to Charlotte). In a land without law, only the few represent the law – like Judge Joseph Dredd.

SO that is the world as to what the comic book showcases, and the film is pretty close adaptation to it as well. The film is also pretty accurate on visualizing a 3-D world that is based from a 2-D medium. Many of the supporting characters have been brought to the screen, and I personally feel that the art department did an OUTSTANDING job of bringing some of those things to life to look just like the comic book. I feel that too often when there is a film adaptation of a comic book, costume designers and the rest of the art department try to go for this plush leather or art nouveux look (think of your initial response to the costume work in X-Men).

But what they did do successfully adapting was the visuals, but not the methodology of the world or the personalities of many of the characters. For example, in the comic book, Judge Dredd has only removed his helmet twice (within thirty years of comic book continuity), and in the book, his face is still censored. And from the look of people that see "old stony face's" appearance, are normally appalled with disgust. In the film, we see Dredd's face for a huge chunk of the film. Which is a constant dispute and cause of disruptions in Hollywood with, "but we need to see the actor's face to convey emotions to the audience. They can't think for themselves! We need to tell them what to think and how to feel based on the portrayal of our leads." Okay, my tirade is over. Actually, did you know that the role of Judge Dredd was initially offered to Arnold Schwarzenegger but he turned it down because he didn't like the idea that his face would be covered through out the whole film. Which would then cause Stallone to step in, demand all of the numerous changes to the script, and that is probably why you see Dredd "helmetless" throughout a majority of the film.

Secondly, it is FORBIDDEN for Judges to embrace a romantic relationship. Figure, this way they could focus solely on their work, not on the lives of others. Judges are also conditioned to be devoid of romance at an early age and also of corruption. Which also helps to play into the universal irony on our own government which the Dredd books frequently poke at. Yes, there is a lot of ironic humor abound in the Dredd books, and if you are a political weirdo, then it may be the book for you. So, when Dredd starts up with this lovely relationship with Hershey, they again break the rules of the Dredd mythos. What he shoulda done after he saved her was pull a lil Jack Burton on her and ride off into the sunset.

Well, I guess I have nothing else to offer for this film review. Again, like I said, I feel that Judge Dredd is an under rated action/sci-fi/comic book film. There have been a LOT worse (cough cough, the Hulk cough cough Fantastic Four series) but don't let Stallone's tight faced expressions and cheesy one liners bring ya down – embrace them! "I knew you'd say dat" Stallone is pretty bad ass in this movie, and it is probably my favorite of his cop portrayals. And just imagine if we could all ban together, we could get a petition together and get a special edition of this DVD out to the world of the underground cult comic book fans! So…who's with me?!

Indiana Jones and that thing about the Crystal Skull (movie review)

his movie takes place in 1957 and could possibly be the fourth of the five proposed Indy films. Now before I took up this endeavor and was able to criticize it, I had my fiancée and myself recap the previous Indy films to know what we were getting into. And before you happen to catch this film, check out a quick recap of the three previous films to see what has progressed so far:

1981's Raiders of the Lost Art so an introduction to the Indy character. A proposed adventure story that was the joint brain child of Hollywood legends George Lucas and Steven Spielberg. Legend has it, Spielberg was hoping to make a film similar to a James Bond picture, but Lucas claimed "I have something better." He proposed the story of an suave archeologist who is a college professor that spends his spare time plundering for artifacts and adventure. He is tempted by one legendary artifact The Art of the Covenant, a supposed "radio to God" that initially held the original Ten Commandments in it. But now there is a rival archeologist who has been employed by the Nazi's to fulfill Hitler's obsession on obtain figures of the occult. In a race against time, Indy and some comrades must discover the secret whereabouts of the Art of the Convenarnt before it falls into the wrong hands.

The film takes place in 1936 and it is primarily an homage to the action/adventurer serials of the 30's. We are also introduced to the elements of Indy: A previous relationship with the drunkard/daughter of Indy's mentor: Maryann Ravenwood, Indy has a fear of snakes, the film opens with a action packed couple scene, Indy fights an indestructible opponent who dies terribly and numerous chase scenes. In the end of the film, Indy's treasure of the Ark is locked up by the G-men somewhere in Washington and it's secrets are gone forever.

1984's Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is actually produced second in the series, but is technically a prequel since it takes place in 1935. The film is different from it's predecessors since there are no Nazi's but the film is riddled with some graphic violence, creepy crawlies, great comedy relief from the little Asian sidekick "Short round," a whiney damsel in distress (who will eventually marry Steven Spiellberg), and some gore and imagery that would even appease a hardcore horror fan like a heart being ripped out of a man's chest (which helped land the film as being the very first film to be rated PG-13).

Indy travels from Shanghai to India and gets roped into saving a village and returning one of their relics (that looks like a bread shaped rock). Whereas in the previous film Indy was all about fortune and glory, he now does this for what is right and ends up creating a pseudo family unit with Willy and Short round. He was exposed to the religion of Hebrew, now it is with the Hindus. A village of children has been abducted by a mad man to help mine for two other stones for complete domination.

The film has some great chase scenes, especially in some mine carts in a crazy looking Disney ride. It has some of the grossest scenes from a dinner ensemble where you are served: Beatles on a half shell, Chilled Monkey Brains, Eyeball Soup and Snake Surprise. Or how about walking through a tunnel of bugs that crawl all over you. Definitely the creepy crawlies is a staple of the Indy series. Finally there is a bit more of a romantic side story that shows off this arrogant romantic side of Dr. Jones as he is trying to seduce Willy, but at the same time acting like the ward of the Robin-esque Short Round (P.S. if you like Goonies, Data plays the role of his qwarky little kid and anything he says is funny) "No time fow wuv Docta Jones" Ahh, racial stereotypes – where have you gone?

1989's Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade goes back to the elements of Raiders with Nazi's, relics, chases, the occult, adventure, comedy, romance and it also has this element of a great father/son relationship between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery. The filmmakers though, well, James Bond was an initial inspiration for the Indy character, why not just hire the man who helped bring it about. Sean Connery plays Henry Jones Sr. and truly makes this film very memorable. I mean, how many times are you gonna see Indy get slapped for saying "Jesus Christ," "That's for blasphemy Junior!" Hehehe, classic.

This film is set in 1938 and Spielberg comments on it as "making up to Lucas for what they did to Temple of Doom." They return to a lot of the hardcore action/adventure stuff, but with a lot of side comedy between father and son. The Nazi's play a perfect movie villain, and the hunting for the Holy Grail has been an adventure quest from the days of King Arthur.

Personally, this is my favorite in the series just solely based on the father/son dynamic, the return of the Nazi's as antagonists, returning John Rhys-Davies as Salla and even bringing in the dim-witted Marcus Brody for the adventure.

Indy is eventually able to find the Holy Grail, and like the film's predecessors of Indy being exposed to the religions of Hebrew, then Hindu – it is now a focus on Christianity. Using his father's notes, a lure of all of his teachings and studies – he is able to find the Grail and save his father with it. Unfortunately the Grail falls into a chasm and the Indy character is still obsessed with finding and obtaining the relic. But it takes of all people, Henry Sr., to tell Indy "Junior – let it go." A great film and a lot of fun, and in my opinion it should be the end of the series. I mean once you get the Holy Grail – how can you go any further?

And now, without further ado…….

2008's Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull returns Indy to the screen after a near 20 year hiatus from the cinema. Like I said before, the film takes place in 1957 – which would make the Indy character 58 years old but is played by Harrison Ford who is 65. Now, I have a LOT of willing suspension of disbelief (which is the fuel for basically any geek that enjoys comics, cartoons, fantasy or professional wrestling) but there is just some elements that even I have a hard time swallowing. Here is just a brief list (SOME SPOILERS AHEAD):

1) An atomic bomb goes off in a town, Indy climbs into a lead lined fridge, which flies high up into the sky, rolls and crashes into the desert landscape and Indy rolls out. 2) While in a high speed chase through the Amazon, people swashbuckler on top of their cars. 3) Commanding an army of monkeys that swing through the Amazon and attack the Communists. 4) Finally and most sad, is seeing this rather old Indy doing things he did years ago. And I love Harrison Ford, and growing up I think he was just a hero for a lot of kids during that era – but seeing him now, I felt like "Hey Indy, I think it's time to hang up the fedora and whip."

There were some other scenes that were just a little hard to swallow, but I'd have to say the film overall was quite enjoyable. A brief plot: Filling in the role that the Nazi's had, we now have "the Reds" hunting down some infamous crystal skulls that can help fill you up with unlimited knowledge. The film opens up at Area 51 and we see there is a connection with Roswell and the alien crash landing to our picture, and we also have a brief cameo of the Ark of the Covenant as it's crate is slightly bust open.

Indy is criticized for helping the Commies, and loses his job as a professor at his college. He befriends a young greaser - Mutt (played by Transformers Shia Lebouf) – yeah I know? Mutt?! But why now, Indy was also named after a dog. So, Mutt needs Indy's help to help rescue Indy's former classmate /archeologist "Ox" who knows of the current whereabouts of the greatest of the Crystal Skulls.

Mutt and Indy hunt down the whereabouts of Ox and an infamous Conquistador who found El Dorado, the Lost City of Gold, in the 15th century. They find his tomb, get the skull and will eventually get trapped by the Commies who are holding Ox prisoner – but also Maryanne Ravenwood –who is also the mother of Mutt and we later discover that Mutt is the son of Indy. Eventually the crew of explorers goes through some chases after chases and will eventually discover the Lost City of Gold. Inside, we learn that Aliens had educated the Mayans centuries ago, their bodies were made out of crystal, and the Crystal Skull is actually the skull of one of the thirteen alien ambassadors who were archeologists themselves. Yeah, I know it is too much to hear right now. In the end of the film, El Dorado and the aliens are transported to an inter-dimensional portal. Indy and Marryanne finally rekindle their relationship and get married. The fedora rolls up to Mutt's feet and we think he is to be the predecessor until Indy takes it back with a smile and struts out of the church.

Mutt very well be the predecessor of the series as Lucas is already starting a rumor mill for a fifth film where Indy would play the sidekick and Mutt would be the main action star. It is the end of the era already seeing Indy going out there, but now I feel like where the third film had the father son dynamic, this film has the roles reversed. In fact, there is even ANOTHER scene on a motorcycle where Mutt evades the Commies and smiles – but Indy scowls at him. Very similar to when Henry Sr. and Jr. are escaping Austria – Indy causes one of them to crash, he smiles and daddy is scowling at him.

Finally, if you are an Indy completist – such as myself, you should check this picture out. Again, there are some elements that are a little hard to swallow – but Indy is such a great character. I think if you enjoy the elements of Batman and/or James Bond, or even some action/adventure/sci-fi fan, you will enjoy this film. I also recommend you go out and buy the the Adventures of Young Indiana Jones to see where Indy came from before his cinematic adventures, it is a great show and very educational. Check it out, it is the first great film of the summer season.

The Dark Knight (movie review)

Okay so my fiancée and I went to go to see The Dark Knight last night and I was QUITE satisfied and my expectations were met. Y'know, I have only seen about three new movies this summer, but this one definitely takes the cake as far as the acting, the action, the explosions, the story and maintaining the Batman mythos. Before I go on any further, I will end up talking a little bit about the earlier Batman films over the years, some of the comics that drew inspiration in the Dark Knight and the spoilers in the film. So you have been warned Batfans – I will spoil this film for you if you keep on reading……

So as some of you might already know, this film is a sequel to Batman Begins which is a reboot of the Batman franchise and pretty much throws out the previous "classic Batman films" that were predominate in the 90's including Batman, Batman Returns, Batman Forever and Batman & Robin. Whereas the classic films were just ridiculed for the most part as getting progressively campy and silly and at sometimes totally ridiculous (like Penguins with rocket launchers), the Nolan brothers' films continue to show this gritty dark side to Batman that he deserves and they have created this universe where having a "Batman" looks like it could happen. They don't throw any "well he does it because he's a supervillian," schtick that you would find in comics in the old days, now they practically provide a science and/or methodology on how or why certain things happen in these films. What I like about these newer films is the believability this is represented in a comic book film. Instead of me getting lost into my criticizing tirades as I have traditionally done in the past, I will instead list my pro's and con's in a detailed and bulleted list that way you can just jump to the info that you would like to see. BUT, what I can tell you is that you need to watch this film, but be prepared to take out a good chunk of your day out to view it, as it is 2 ½ hours long.

What I liked about in this movie:

  • Heath Ledger was amazing. I found him terrifying, mesmerizing and hilarious all rolled into one. He is definitely someone to portray the Joker where you can find the character as absolutely terrifying and then laugh at something dark that he does.
  • Explosions and action. This film could satisfy any action genre nut's taste with the amount of gunfire and blazing fury displayed on the screen. There were at times I felt that it was a little excessively violent, and it made me think of my nine year old brother that wanted to see this film. Thinking back to all of the carnage – I would def NOT show this film to a young mind.
  • An inspiration from the maxi-series The Long Halloween. Jeph Loeb and Tim Sale do an excellent job on a line of books that are "in the vein" of Frank Miller's Batman Year One. Thinking of this book and the portrayal of Batman / Gordon / Harvey Dent working together to clean up the city AND showing the end of a crime era of organized crime into "super villains" made this film more believable for me that this would happen.
  • The introduction of Harvey Dent into the story. They show that he is a determined D.A. and his focus to finally take down the mob's hold of Gotham, but more importantly how a good man could "fall from grace" and turn into Two-Face.
  • Lucious Fox is Batman's "Q". I don't know how any can't see an influence from the James Bond series, especially since the pre-dominant crew is from jolly 'ol ..:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />England.
  • Showcasing not just the heroes of Gotham, but the people of Gotham that create a further extension of the character that is Gotham City. I think in previous films we have just gotten a sense of the city by how dark it is, the aroma of crime and the architectural style – but now I felt it was a little bit more personalized. Kind of like the first two Spidey films that we got to see the people of NY pulling together to help Spidey, I saw the people of Gotham loosing their minds and at the same time uniting to make their own choices and not be directed by and fueled by their fear and intimidation from the Joker.
  • The scale and scope of this film – I liked how it was not only confined to Gotham, but featured some stuff in Hong Kong.
  • The ascension of evil and control from the Joker character. Although they really don't show his origin story, nor do they mention anything that he fell into a bat of acid, I felt like we were just to assume that he was a very articulate and well planned criminal mastermind, deceptive, misleading, highly intelligent and his desire to just "watch the world burn." The film starts off with him bumping off each of his own men during a bank robbery and then he sells his services to the organized crime of Gotham in a promises he would kill the Batman. By starting off a sole criminal he slowly takes over one gang after another until he has a hold of the whole city and even tries to spread his disease to Harvey Dent by turning him into another super villain.
  • The symbolism that Harvey Dent is the White Knight and Batman is the Dark Knight (one of the last lines in the film).
  • The struggle and a bit of a love triangle between Rachel Dawes, Bruce and Harvey Dent. You really see and can kind of feel all of the extra issues and dilemmas that it takes to be a hero (both in the perspective of Batman and Harvey Dent). But the number one thing that Bruce Wayne sacrifices for the little people of Gotham is a simple life, especially being able to fall in love and have a stable life with a woman. You really feel for his dilemma.
  • The film opens up with the Scarecrow's gang being busted – to me this was essential and really makes a smooth transition from one movie to the next by just briefly featuring the last villain. I think connections like this, as in the opening of Rocky films, are what make sequels tight and flowing with one another.
  • You get a preview of The Watchmen which comes out in March. Def the next highly anticipated comic movie. But will the ambition of the Graphic Novel be just too much for the silver screen? Only time will tell. The images look great, especially down to the detail of The Comedian's smiley face button.
  • Setting up the Batman series for more continuing tales. The film ends on an extremely dark note (no pun intended) but within the last five minutes or so we have the following bad events: 1) Batman takes the blame for Harvey Dent's murders so that his good image is maintained. 2) Lucious Fox quits Wayne Enterprises because he doesn't like the idea of spying on people with their cell phones (but he has to type in his name first) 3) Rachel Dawes' final message that she was going to tell Bruce she was going to stick with Harvey and not wait for Bruce to give up the Batman mantle as burned up by Alfred. HONESTLY, I felt like the ending of the film was like in the same vein as The Empire Strikes Back, by having your characters/hero and their loneliest point in the middle act to pull them up into greatness for the grand finale.

What I didn't like in this movie:

  • This film was primarily shot during the day. I sure it might have been an angle to save a little cash on the production but I have always felt Gotham should be primarily dark to continue with that creepy/grimey atmosphere. But I always like to think about legendary Batman writer/editor Denny O'Neil who likes to say something along the line of "Metropolis is New York city in the spring, during the day in a rather rich and prosperous part of time. Gotham is in New York City during the fall, at night in one of the poorest parts of town." SO based off of that summarized quote from Denny, I felt this film was showing too much "Metropolis" and not enough "Gotham"
  • Introducing and bumping off the Harvey Dent character waaaay too fast. I really wish they took about a film or two to showcase Harvey, his tackling of organized crime, building of the relationships between Batman, Gordon and himself and perhaps hinting about his mental issues. I really liked how they treated the Harvey Dent character in the Batman the Animated Series that showed a strong friendly relationship between Harvey and Bruce Wayne, but that he also had a dark side that could snap into a violent mood swing at any time AND that he had a history of some psychological issues. In this film, we see Dent is a bit of a bad ass, but taking a guy's gun from him that tries to shoot him in the court room, he hints about his dad's "lucky coin" and then he really goes off the deep end after his girlfriend dies. I mean, I can kind of understand loosing your girlfriend in an explosion is a terrible thing – but then denying the use of skin graphs on yourself because "you want to be truly seen for what you are….Two Faced." It is nice when the Joker talks to him and basically manipulates the situation by telling Two Face that it was the police department's fault that his Rachel was murdered and then "pushing their White Knight" into darkness. But Hell, at least it is A LOT better than Tommy Lee Jones' interpretation in Batman Forever that treats him more like a third rate Joker.
  • I know this is totally out of everyone's control, but the Joker character lives in the end – but now unfortunately Heath Ledger is dead. SO, I feel some fans might want to see a return of this character, but probably others that will be resentful of someone trying to fill Heath Ledger's shoes (especially if he wins an Oscar for this role). But then again, I'm sure fans said the same thing about Jack Nicholson that "Cesar Romero is the only Joker" and other fans of modern time might have said "Jack Nicholson and/or Mark Hamill are the only Jokers for me – screw this gay cowboy – he can't pull off the legendary clown price of Crime."
  • Maggie Gyllenhall (yeah, Jake's sister who actually screws the Joker in Brokeback) replaces the rather cute Katie Holmes. I feel like Maggie's got a pretty damn saggy face that the Joker should have sliced on the corners to give her a prettier smile.
  • Batman's gruffy voice starts to get a little annoying. I wonder if Christian Bale couldn't talk normally after shooting his Batman scenes. I liked in the last film when he would throw in a few lines that will creep you the Hell out – now he is in these extended scenes of dialogue when you are like "Dude, take a throat lozenge or something – you sound like you just ate a carton of cigarettes."
  • Finally, the overall length of this film. Sure it might have helped that I saw this film at midnight and might have been a little tired but this film is 2 ½ hours long. What happened to the days when you can tell a story on the screen in 90 minutes. Now everyone in Hollywood needs to make Epics. I wish Hollywood would try to slim down their tales and stretch out storylines further so that they can focus more on the characters and details. I felt like this film COULD HAVE been just a focus on the end of the mob, the rise of the Joker and the friendship/camaraderie between Batman, Gordon and Dent. They could have done the whole Two Face thing in another film or two and focus more on the tension of friendships. But, we'll have to see what the Batman film has in store – cause I can't wait.

Friday the 13th (remake) movie review

Friday the 13th movie review
A remake that you SHOULD remember

I’ve already kind of read some of the reviews that this movie got elsewhere on the net, it is pretty much unanimous that the movie sucked and it is getting ripped apart by critics. Well, of course it is, I don’t think many critics understand horror films and dismiss them as stupid, childish, immature, cheap thrill rides. But I disagree, I really liked the movie, I think it showcased and excellent blend of horror and comedy, some interesting deaths, pretty good scenes of some nudity but most importantly – the return of the greatest slasher of them all – Jason Voorhees.
For those of you that know me, or have read some of my previous posts, you know of my love of the Friday the 13th series and the Jason character. You might have also known that I once called out sick from work to have a Friday the 13th marathon drinking game (it was rough by the way and I made it all the way up to Jason X before I got too sick). I’ve been through the good (F13 part 4 & 6), the bad (F13 part X & 8) and the ugly (F13 part 5) but I hold each one of these films as a treasure from my childhood. I mean, how many films can you think of where the audience roots for the bad guy, while simultaneously being frightened by him?
When I initially heard that a Friday the 13 part 12 idea was scrapped and was going to be turned into a remake, I groaned and worried, “oh man, not another – is there no franchise safe from Hollywood?” But, I then heard that the team behind the Texas Chainsaw Massacre remakes were going to be working on it, along with the writing team from Freddy vs. Jason AND Paramount was going to be involved in the franchise again – I felt the project was going to be in good hands. I became curious as to what direction they might take as far as a remake went and I was hoping that the film would perhaps relieve some of the mystery behind the Jason character and not just “pop him into the series” for the sake of making more sequels. And then prolong those sequels and try to make his back story just a knock off of Michael Myers.
Yeah, that’s right – I said it. Jason / Friday the 13th has been a knock off of Halloween films right from the get go. Now this is just my humble opinion, and I still love the Friday films regardless but here is my biggest gripe. Okay, so the original Friday film ended with Jason’s mom dying, and then the second film opens up saying that “by the way, Jason never really died, he was alive all along and saw his mom murdered that night.” I feel the producers had to do this because the original Friday the 13th film was so popular they needed a sequel. SO they must have done a springboard off the original ending of Jason coming out of the water to do his infamous final scare. Jason became the main killer for parts 2-4, and then it seems attention was going to be sent onto Jason’s childhood nemesis Tommy Jarvis (originally played by the legendary Corey Feldman) so they didn’t use Jason as the murder for part 5.
BUT in part 6 he came back as basically a zombie, in seven he was defeated by supernatural/E.S.P powers, in eight he was washed away by toxic waste. BUT in nine he came back whole again and the film makers tried to create a horror film for the horror fans with Jason Goes to Hell. A film with a new direction in the series since obtained by New Line Cinema, and featured homage to horror films and gore fans alike (such as Evil Dead) but I felt the plot was too much similar going back to the Halloween series. In part 9, they claim that Jason keeps coming back and there was this curse on his blood line and he can’t rest until he ends his bloodline. SO he has to kill his sister, and then his niece and his niece’s daughter. Just like the Laurie Strode angle and ended up with a druid cult in the original Halloween films. Finally, going back full circle, we have created another horror franchise named after a holiday, featuring a masked/strong psychopath, killing teenagers and having their corpses drop/pop up around the place. Halloween set the tone for the slasher genre with numerous imitators in the 80’s (April Fool’s Day, Graduation Day, Silent Night Deadly Night) but it is Friday the 13th that dared to bare with it’s gore and interesting kills.

SPOILER ALERTS LISTED BELOW:

Well, I was a little disappointed that the film didn’t really tie up all loose ends from the original series, and is kind of like a remake – but featured elements from about the first three or four Friday films. The film opens up on June 13, 1980 just like a near word for word remake for the ending of the original film. Pamela Voorhees is giving her speech to the last camp counselor before getting her head cut off. And then out of no where, Jason is a little boy standing by her decapitated body. SO my whole thing they need to talk about if they make a sequel to this or just dedicate a whole film to Jason’s back story is, “if he loved his mother so much and she was going around killing all of these counselors on his birthday to avenge him – why didn’t he just tell her, hey mommy I’m really not dead by the way!”
The film then jumps to modern day, and then begins almost like the second Friday the 13th film. A group of teens gathering around a camp fire and recapping Jason’s legend and how “you know what’s weird is that Jason’s body just came back.” Thankfully, the teens get drunk, one girl rubs oil over her boobs and they are murdered off one by one by “bag head” Jason. Yeah, just like Jason in the original Friday part 2, this Jason wears like this burlap sack thing wrapped over his head. For some reason or another, there is rumored pot field growing around Crystal Lake that initially this group came to find. Well, I guess Jason didn’t like the fact they were touching his bud, so he murders them, and then another two stumble into his house and take his mom’s locket. Well, thank God one of those kids looks QUITE like Pamela Voorhees and Jason keeps her trapped in his underground tunnel of his cabin for about six weeks.
So, that one girl ends up having a brother who goes searching for her, and he ends up crossing paths with yet another group of teens that want to stay and some asshole’s parents’ cabin for the weekend. Well, it isn’t too long before this group of kids intrude on Jason’s territory of Crystal Lake and he kills them off one by one. That’s another gripe that I have, if these people know that Jason is going around murdering people, why would you want to build a super luxurious house on Crystal Lake? The brother character ends up coming to a barn, which made me think a lot about of the infamous barn scenes in Friday part 3. There is this really dirty red neck character who also offers to sell some of Jason’s weed in the woods. Later on the red neck hears some scuffling coming from upstairs in the attic, and it is Jason trying to steal some kerosene. BUT along the way, Jason also discovers his legendary hockey mask and puts it on after the red neck comments on seeing his face, “oh dude, that’s not right.”
Well, I won’t get into tooooooo many details, but the film is intertwined with some pretty funny jokes, a lot of pot smoking humor, pretty good titty scenes and okay deaths. I wished there was some more interesting and original deaths (and a higher total body count) that they could have taken advantage of (once I saw the tools and circular saw in the tool shed, I was hoping Jason would have a field day). But for the most part, he stays true to his machete, there is some interesting slow gouging and penetration of various objects and he even proves to be an excellent archer. But overall, I really enjoyed the movie, even if I was criticized for laughing too much whenever someone gets murdered – and others might criticize the film for being a little bit too predictable. But, I just blame that on the genre and what Scream did to it years ago. So, you should go see this movie if you are true to the slasher genre or just a Jason complete-est. Or perhaps you just wanna take your kids and they can relive the Jason craze you had from years ago.

Beowulf (movie review)

I – AM – BEOWULF! A scene that still stands out in my mind as the Geatland warrior erupts out of the eyeball of a sea monster after being swallowed. MAN, a fucking awesome movie this was. Now, I knew absolutely nothing about this story or film going into it, but I did know that it was about scantingly clad Scandinavian warriors in a sword and sorcery epic, and the film was shot in digital 3-D.

Robert Zemeckis (director of such earlier films as the Back to the Future trilogy, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Forest Gump and Death Becomes Her) continues with his technological film making expertise by making the film of Beowulf. Zemeckis utilizes the same motion capture techniques he did on his earlier film of The Polar Express which at time you can't even tell you are watching computer generated actors, or if the camera is truly on them. But the film is also in digital 3-D, or sometimes mentioned as true-d. The film REALLY feels like you are a part of the grande scope of the film, you are flying through the woods, you are having arrows whizzing by your heads – and Zemeckis can utilize a simple crane or dolly shot and you are in the midst of fighting Grendel or a golden dragon.

The film was written and adapted by Neil Gaiman (from comic book fame of writing The Sandman Series) and Roger Avary (a close friend and co-writer with Quentin Tarantino). After reading up on the poem and examining it's elements, I could clearly see the contrast between the film and the story. The writers took some free will into their own interpretations of the story, and took a basic tale of a feuding warrior that kills a troll, a serpent and a dragon – has much more connections and lineation to the Bible. It is even estimated that the ancient poem was translated by Christian monks and had lines inserted about Christianity. Because most scholars believe that although the era that the epic takes place, the Germanic/Scandinavian tribes weren't Christianized yet. BUT elements of Christianity are brought up by certain characters, such as John Malkovich's Unferth, who can be seen as a Norse Wiseman at the beginning of the film, but clearly bears a large golden cross and perhaps a priest by the end of the film.

So yeah, the story of the tale can be clear and dry as a warrior comes to town to kill a monster, save the girl, appease the king and go back home to the lands of the Geats. Some of the actors and writers thought that the story didn't go much further into that, so they delved deeper into the mythos and created several other themes that you can find predominately in the movie now: [NOTE: The movie review is a little interactive, kinda like a "Choose Your Fate" book. So in order to read about the movie in order, follow the steps to go to the correct Theme section]



Theme 1: The sins of the father…a motif and phrase repeated over and over again in the Bible, but also pre-dominate in another epic poem, Homer's The Odyssey. The line is even repeated again and again by Unferth after he is attacked by the golden dragon. Okay, let me explain this theme's origins a little bit more….. SPOILERS AHEAD………….



Okay, so first off in the film, there is this troll/monster being called Grendel, who is played by Crispin Glover (who also worked on the Back to the Future series with Zemeckis as George McFly). In the original story, the monster just likes to come to King Hrothgar's (played by a normally drunk and shameless Sir Anthony Hopkins) hall to kill some men and run away. In the film, you see this throbbing sore that is embedded into the Grendel's left ear that can not stand the sound of merry making from this court. The Grendel appears a few times, kills some people, eats a few others, but when he approaches the King, the King tells him that he will fight him, but the monster disappears back to his lair. It is stated in the poem that the King is protected by God, and why the Grendel wouldn't hurt him – but in the film we are left to interpret later that perhaps the King sired the Grendel and this creature is now his curse whenever his people get a little bit too rowdy. Grendel is a party pooper.

SO, there is no one in town to kill this creature, so they put up a want ad for a monster slayer, and Beowulf takes the call. Beowulf comes to town with his 14 battle hungry thanes. The King is pretty sure that Beowulf can kill the beast, and he tells him that, "if you can kill the Grendel, I will give you my wife and half of my treasure." The most coveted of all treasures the King possesses is the ..:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com
:office:smarttags" />Golden Horn of Fafnir. Now, I can't recall if that is the official name, but it is this cup shaped like a dragon's horn that you can drink mead out of. The King talks about how he slayed the dragon Fafnir (ALSO Fafnir is the name of the dragon from Dio's Killing the Dragon album) and how he had to slice it's throat open with a small dagger to pierce it's heart. A small plot device into some foreshadowing at the end of the film.

Beowulf goes for it, he kills the Grendel with his bare hands and becomes a hero. He decides to venture out into the outerlands and kill Grendel's Mother, who is a water demon that can shape shift anywhere into a sexy Oscar looking statue, a sea/serpent or Angelina Jolie. Beowulf goes in there with armor, a sword and the horn of Fafnir, whose golden glow is the only thing that can guide him into the cave………(for the continuing part of this story, jump over to the THEME 2 – Temptation section)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

{You should have just read the section of Theme 3 before reading anymore of this}…..okay, this Golden Dragon attacks the Church of Unferth. There the half dragon/half man being tells Unferth, "I have a message for my father….." Unferth is carried back into town, laid out on a crucifix shaped stretcher and repeats to Beowulf again and again, "the sins of the father, the sins of the father…" Due to Beowulfs lying and deceitfulness to his people, and breaking his vow infused from temptation, he has brought damnation to his kingdom.

He now knows that he must rid the kingdom once and for all of this menacing golden dragon. He once again returns to the Mother's cave, with sword in one hand and Golden horn in other. He is yet again standing next to the typical fantasy/best friend role of Wiglaf (who is played by Brenden Gleeson, who is practically reprising his best friend/warrior role as he was to Sir William Wallace's best friend in Braveheart, but you might recall him of a more recent role in the Harry Potter series of Mad Eye Moody.)

Beowulf tries to confide in Wiglaf the truth, but he doesn't want to hear it. Actually, Wiglaf is probably one of the most sensible and level headed characters in the whole film. He knows when the shit hits the fan, to pack the boat and run, and there is a reason why he is last of the fourteen danes left from Grendel's mother's revenge. But instead, Beowulf tries to tell him that if anything happens to me, you are going to be the King. Beowulf then enters the cave, he tries to give the horn back but the Mother says it's too late. Then the golden dragon arises, and begins to attack the kingdom. The CGI on the dragon is great, and you can even notice some of the facial features of Beowful in its own creation.

To quicly wrap up the rest of the film, the Dragon lays scourge on the land and attacks everything that Beowulf possesses. Similar to typical "Sins of the father," archetypes where they will destroy everything of the father's. Here, I like to think of these final scenes of like Luke and Darth Vader, or perhaps Baron Frankenstein and his Creature – taking away everything he holds dear. Eventually Beowulf is able to kill the dragon but dies in the process. He fulfills the prophecy and looks back to how he should have lived his life. Devoid or arrogance, temptation and violence. Beowulf dies a tragic hero. ………(for the continuing part of this story, jump over to the THEME 2 – Temptation section)



Theme 2: Temptation, Beowulf enters the cave and what he expects to find of Grendel's mother as a ferocious looking creature, as really a very sexy, golden, harden nippled, DSL plumped up Angelia Jolie. The mother is really upset that the Grendel is dead, and all she wants to have is a heir. She tells Beowulf it has been sooo long since she has had a man come visit her, and all that Beowulf has to do is bang her and leave the golden horn there, she will make him the greatest king of all time, and his legends of heroics will live on forever through song and tales long after everything he knows turns to dust. The mother is the purest form of temptation in the film, and was a plot device also created by the writing team.

It was their interpretation to find out why they thought the Grendel would steal men from the town and take them back to the cave – well so that the mother could have sex with them and sire more heirs. It is hinted in the film that Grendel and his mother are the last of the demonic kind, and it is told in the poem that they are both from the blood line of Cain in the Bible. SO, instead of Beowulf cutting off her head like he does in the poem, he is sucked into her temptation. Like I said, she is physically temptation with this hot body, but she is golden and surrounded by gold. The golden horn of Fafnir is a re-occurring device used as an extension of her temptation outside of the cave. The horn seduced the King into siring her Grendel, and now the horn seduces Beowulf.

Beowulf screws her and leaves the horn there. The only stipulation he needs to do in order to maintain his socio/economic status is that he leaves the horn in the cave with her and give her an heir. Beowulf agrees and returns to the town to tell the towns people what he has accomplished…and there was much rejoicing. But this whole weak willed men by gold motif made me think a lot about The Lord of the Rings and how much Tolkien could have been possibly influence by this tale into his device of "the one to rule them all." ………(for the continuing part of this story, jump over to the THEME 3 – DECEIT INTO ASCENSION)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..







{You should have just read the ending section of Theme 1 before reading anymore of this}…..Okay, so now Beowulf is dead, and in true Viking fashion, he gets a Viking funeral and he is burnt on a boat full of his golden possessions. His best friend/sidekick Wiglaf is now the King, and he is strolling along on the beach. He watches the final embers on Beowulf's boat take it down to the ocean to hence he came, and in the distance, Wiglaf can see Jolie/Mother Creature rising out from the Ocean and giving the corpse of Beowulf a final kiss before he sinks into her depths.

Then, the Golden Cup of Fafnir washes up on the shore. The temptation has gone full circle as Wiglaf picks up the horn, cleans it up and stares at it in amazement. He is bewildered and can't believe his eyes to see and stare at the beautiful woman calling to him to come out into the sea with her. Wiglaf walks out to her, he is waste deep in the ocean, his body glows with temptation. Does he take the bait and become seduced like the two previous kings? Or would he break the cycle? I feel this makes a great ending and REALLY gets you to think in a film, instead of being told what to think. Personally, I feel that Wiglaf would go out there to kill her, as he would know just a little about this witch's trickery.

THE END…. GO CHECK THIS MOVIE OUT!





THEME 3: DECEIT INTO ASCENSION- Once Beowulf arrives back into town, he tells everyone that he has killed the monster. You can tell of the uncomfortableness he has on his face when they begin to ask him, "what happened to this….or what happened to the Golden horn….where is the head of Grendel's mother….?" Beowulf tip toes around certain lies, and becomes quite upset when the King asks him in private where the head of the Mother was, and if he really did kill her. The King can obliviously see that Beowulf is lying to him, as the King was more than likely down that same road before. I also feel that the King's tall tale of killing the Dragon was probably one of his ways into ascension of the throne, who in the same process accepted the price of not having any children of his own except for the Grendel.

Beowulf is also known for his weavings of tall tales to instill his own status of super hero as many of his Danes know of his exaggerations of killing sea monsters and the like. BUT, once the King realizes that Grendel is dead, and what Beowulf has just gone though in order to achieve his own social status in the Kingdom, he knows he is no longer needed and that the Mother's curse is no longer his. He decrees that Beowulf will be his heir and he then kills himself.

Beowulf becomes the King, and the story jumps ahead fifty years or so. He has amassed an empire, and a small village is now a huge stone castle with a gated community. He feels terrible for what he has become, and even announces to a small soldier that tries to kill him, "that I died a long time ago." The King Beowulf has done what he had to achieve his social status, but now something comes back into his possession…The Golden Horn of Fafnir.

A slave boy on the outlands discovers the horn and returns it to the King. Beowulf questions, "is that it? Was there no witch, no monster – no woman to go with it?" The boy agrees, and in turn Beowulf breaks his promise to Grendel's mother. Beowulf kinda has this look on his face of like, "hmmm, she is gone, now I can keep the horn," which I don't know understand why this horn is so freakin' possessive, I mean, it looks pretty and all, but I think that if I made a deal with a golden Jolie witch, I'd keep my promise. So, on the next day, a golden dragon terrorizes the land and burns down the church of Unferth. The way that Beowulf breaks his promise to Grendel's mother, heavily reminds me of the short story in Tales from the Darkside the Movie called "Lover's Vow," (that story where Ajax from The Warriors is this talented artist in desperate need of inspiration. One night he sees a Gargoyle kill a man, the Gargoyle promises that he will let Ajax live as long as he never tells a living soul. In turn, Ajax becomes inspired with Gargoyle-esque art and he becomes a big sensation. He then falls in love with Rae Dawn Chong, and years pass, until he eventually confides in Rae that he doesn't want any secrets between them. Ajax breaks his promise, and Rae Dawn turns into the Gargoyle and kills Ajax. Gotta keep your promise!) ………(for the continuing part of this story, jump over to the THEME 1 – The sins of the father)

The top ten horror films to watch just prior to Halloween part 10: Halloween (1978 version) movie review

This is it folks, your wait is FINALLY over. We've come a long way to the top if you wanna rock n'roll, but we've all struggled on and have made it to this final film. Just prior to this, I've also listed my top 10 films that just couldn't make the cut. Two of them, Dawn of the Dead and Hellraiser were actually both in my original countdown when I wrote this for my school's magazine. But from my time of writing that paper to current, I'd become bearing witness to two other horror films unlike any other and needed to have the world opened up to them, (I also felt it wasn't fair to have two of Romero's films on the countdown) So I ended up putting Dead Alive and Re-Animator in their places. I also unfortunately felt that Hellraiser (as good of a horror film that it was) wasn't as quintessisential and important in the movement in horror as I've felt the other two were. So aside from that other posting of info, let's get to business shall we?

Well, here I promise you the true gritty details: I give you the facts, list the breast counts and how much buckets of blood are gonna come spurting on out at ya. As told in Joe Bob Briggs fashion, I get right to business (after listing a lot of bullshit or useless tidbits of information) but I want you, the little people, to really get the gist of these films the way they were intended. So for god's sake: Join up with Netflix, cause every lil rinky dinky Blockbuster video has capitolized and smothered out the lil mom and pop video rental stores to ever carry any of this stuff ever again. Some of them are rare gems, and some are commercialized. And some yet have so many cuts, versions and even remakes - you'll never really know which ones to get. SO my suggestion to you guys is either be lucky enough to bump into these films on your digital cabel/satelite provider - or just go out and buy these films. Some of them I bought just on a whim or from info I've read from the great sites like www.imdb.com or www.houseofhorrors.com I put out the money for them and never live to regret it.

If you just happen to stumble upon my countdown, you can either read my previous listings OR just read the following messages of the recent reviews that you have missed: 10)A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 3: The Dream Warriors 9)Friday the 13th Part 6: Jason Lives 8)Return of the Living Dead 7)Dead Alive (aka Brain Dead) 6)Re-Animator 5)Demons (aka Demoni) 4)Evil Dead 3) The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (original) 2)Night of the Living Dead (1968) and now for the final addition to my countdown.....

1)Halloween HALLOWEEN-1.JPG (12200 bytes)

1978, Directed and written by John Carpenter, also written by Debra Hill

HALLOWEEEN you say, Bo? How could Halloween be better than Night of the Living Dead. Well in all honestly, looking at them two different film wise, Night is the superior in style and landmarking achievement - but thinking about the time of the year "Halloween" there is nothing better than to set the mood than John Carpenter's landmarkish "slasher bith giving film" than Halloween. It' sgot pumpkins, a curse, dressing up, nudity, teenagers getting cut up, Jamie Lee running around with no bra on, Donald Pleasance acting crazy - the whole bunch. If my countdown would take place any otoher time of the year, I'm sure the numbers would be swithced at this instant. But, taking in all consideration that the actual holiday of Halloween is but a mere few days away, there's nothing more enjoyable than the slasher Myers chasing Jamie Lee and Dr. Loomis chasing Myers.

Most people would like to consider this film as the beginning of the whole slasher/body count film genre. Others like to consider that Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho would actually be the first slasher film, and other's even consider quite a few of Mario Bava's films such as Blood and Black Lace as being the first kinda body count films. But I for one like to see that John Carpenter took both his love of Psycho (from using the Sam Loomis character to how Myers swings a knife and incorporating the Italian style of horror of the gloved killer {such as in Dario Argento's earlier Giallo films}) and made a mixture of the two that became the slasher genre.

Not too many people realize that John Carpenter's masterpiece was the start of it all that moved us into the slasher/body count genre of the 80's. But he set the stage that Cunningham and crew used over and over again formulaically and systematically time and time again with the Friday the 13th series. Which I am a far bigger Jason fan over a Myers fan, but we gotta give credit where credit is due. With the devolpment of Friday the 13th then came the idea if you had a couple of teenagers, a camera and some woods - you could make a horror film. Then came more supernaturual twists to the slasher genre in the years to come with films like Nightmare on Elm Street, Hellraiser and Chucky. But, if not for the daring escapades that John Carpenter set forth with this film - we'd have nothing of the likes. I feel if not for Halloween, we'd still be seeing films concerned about demonic possession like The Omen, Rosemary's Baby or The Exorcist because they were the biggest sellers of the later 70's. The original golden age monsters that Universal provide us we're dying out with all of the remakes by Hammer Horror, society needed newer - bigger and mroe frightening boogeymen for a more modern day and age.

pumpkin.jpg (4921 bytes)With the coming of Myers, aside from Norman Bates in Psycho, we now not only are frightened of the killer, but you'll find people rooting on for the bad guy. Ever go to a slasher film in the theatres, more people are happy to see their serial killer hero slashing up their victims and giggling when they die so viciousily. Not often you'll find yourself screaming FOR the bad guy in appreciation instead of fear. And the same went for all of the other slashers that followed, and why there is so much merchandise from t-shirts to action figures that deal with these modern day monsters. It was far and fine time that we had some more monsters that we would appreciate, and it couldn't have been done without the cursed one known as Michael Myers.

Now before I get going with this film, let's talk about all of it's convoluded sequels. I'm not gonna get into the plots of much of them, but try and paint you a picture of their universes. Think of all of the films existining in the great Halloween universe, and certain films withint the series took different roads in it to make them connected. I can think of about 3 seperate timeliens within the series:

A) THe Lauire Strode timeline: This would involve Halloween 1,2, Halloween H:20 and Halloween 8 and probably soon to be 9. This one states that Laurie Strode went into hiding, and would eventually have a boy who "twenty years later" Michael would come for her to kill the blood line yet again. Which he does by part 8 so his purpose should end as well, instead it doesn't and yet they keep making his films

B)Halloween 3: A celtic group that makes masks that will on Halloween create devastation and evil blah blah. In this film, we actually see that the originally Halloween film is a movie withint this universe created by John Carpenter.

C)The Jamie Strode timeline: Occurs in Halloweens 4,5,6 - these films basically state that after Halloween 2 and before 4, the Jamie Lee character ended up having a child but died in a car crash with her then husband. Jamie survived, went up for adoption until Myers found out his blood line continued and he needed to kill his neice. These films wouldn't be antyhing wihtout Donald Pleasance (who was pretty muich tricked into returning for his role when notified that Carpenter would be reutnring). In four and five she's stilll a lil girl being hunted down, but by 6 she is abducted by this weird cult that would force Michale to fuck his neice and create a new evil. So now Myer's is a bitch of the cult, but Tommy (the boy who was babysat in the original film) ends up keeping that baby safe after Jamie is murdered. The cult comes after him and it's chaotic. The producer's cut of this film is awesome if you can find it - otherwise don't and when this film ends - they also end the concept of the creapish cult and by the next sequel return to the Laurie Strode timeline for H20.

The story- On Halloween in 1963, a young boy by the name of Michael Myers is spending a typical Halloween dressed up. He's awaiting for his older sister to probably go out with him for Halloween while she's getting ready. He sees her naked, grabs a huge ass kitchen knife and stabs her to death. There's really no motivation or wondering why hed did it - Michael just pretty much goes catatonic from that point on not talking to anyone just staring off into space.

Being that Michale is only six at the time, he couldn't be trialed as an adult - so he's locked up in Smith's Grove Warren County Sanitarium until he's 18. Dr. Sam Loomis (as played by the legendary Donald Pleasance) is his doctor and tries to get anyting out of him. But Loomis knows of the evil within Michael, he stared into his eyes ...."those black lifeless eyes" So Loomis warns everyone how evil that Meyers is, he needs to be either locked up or continued into a maximum security penitentary on his 18th birthday which is Halloween.

This brings us up to (then) present time, it's just about Halloween in 1978, and Michael is to be transfered to be trialed and for a more maximum security prison for killing his older sister those years ago. Only Loomis knows just how evil that Michael really is (and for those Halloween-philes from reading the comics, Michael murdered Loomis' wife years ago while he was in prison. Know one would ever think Michael did it because he'll just stare at the walls, and through the walls and beyond the walls back to his hometwon of Haddonfield, Illinois where he must extinguish his blood line that he just knows still do exist.

So Loomis and Nurse Marion are on their way to make sure Michael is transered, but he's able to escape. Which causes all of th eother nut jobs to run away but Michael hijacks a car and drives back home. Of course Loomis is pissed and knows where Michael is heading - so he's on the trail back to Haddonfield to head him off at the pass if you will, since in Carpenter's eyes - each one of his films is a Western. Along the way, Loomis is just on his trail and notices a mechanic is murdered and his truck is stolen along with the jumpsuit of the Mechanic. They find the car Michael stole from Smith's Grove and his medical scrubs. Loomis continues on to Haddonfield where Myers is already setting up camp.loomis-3.jpg (9238 bytes)

Cue in for nerdy lil Laurie Strode

laurie-1.jpg (8864 bytes)

(played by one of the earliest and greatest Scream Queen's Jamie Lee Curtis in one of her earliest roles). Well Laurie and her friends are all getting ready for the Halloween festivities, makign out and talking out boys (typically 70's girls talk) but Laurie is a good girl, and is a lil bashful but then focuses on how she has to babysit that night for some kids. Her friends all want to take advantage that parents won't be home where they can have pre-marriedal sex and do drugs blah blah.

Laurie and her friend Annie are walking from school, occassionaly stalked by a weirdo in a car, which Annie screams "Speed kills!" Lol, the girls later cruise around and smoke some pot where Annie bumps into her dad Sherrif Brackett who is investigating the fact that the local halloween store was broken into and someone just stole a mask and such - pay no heed to foreshadowing folks. The girls go about and continue getting ready for the night to get wasted or babysit or whatever.

In the mean time, Lynda and her boyfriend Bob are off to get laid

lynda-2.jpg (6248 bytes)

and have a few beers as the lights go down in Haddonfield. Myers is ready to strike as Loomis has entered town and meets up with Sherrif Brackett to join their forces to hunt down the killer known as Myers. Of course Brackett is a lil skeptical, but the two men are off to do some damage (the best is seeing the Sherrif's reaction when Loomis whips out his pistol and starts to do some damage) Oh, I have a permit.loomis-1.jpg (7459 bytes)

Well then comes in the formala that all slasher fans are all too familiar about. If your a teenager having sex or doing drugs you're gonna die. WHich is why I think Myers initially killed his older sister for when she had sex with her boyfriend and would make sensse that procreation to continue his bloodline is why they must die for it. The formula was re-used in the Friday the 13th films buecasue the camp counselors were too busy screwing than her watching lil Jason while he was drowning.

One by one Laurie's friends are dropping off and she can't reach them, murders come and murders go and Sherriff and Loomis are trying to stop all of the madness. Evenutally when Michael comes for Laurie everyone joins forces and Loomis must save the day. Who will survive the night, how many bullets can Michale take, how will the lil babysat children be affected by this night in the years to come - what is to come on Halloween, the night HE came home?

Things to look out for:michael-4.jpg (8198 bytes)

A gripping original score by director/composer John Carpenter with his digital creepy synthesizer beat. From this point on a tradiitional theme in all of Carpenter's film that go with all of his films like Big Trouble in Little China, Christine, Assault on Precint 13 and many others

Wire hanger Fu

Knitting Needle Fu

laurie-8.jpg (5303 bytes)

Bleedign eyes from the Myers mask

Willaim Shatner is frightening

Dont' hide in the closet

Unescapable death

Butter stains your clothes

Michael Myers enjoys killing dogs

Don't laugh at Michael in a cheesy blanket costume

Slasher POV in the clown mask

Omininous echoing of breathing in hte Myer's mask

For God's sake, look behind you when he pops up!@

laurie-3.jpg (6420 bytes)

Don't say: "I'll be right back"

Don't have sex unless your married

Don't smoke pot and drive around town when your dad is the Sheriff

Listen to Dr. Loomis when he warns you

Your dead friends and loved ones popping out and dropping all around you

Take notice when someone just randomnly steals a William Shatner mask from your local costume shop.

Memorable quotes:

[referring to a partially eaten dog]
Sheriff Leigh Brackett: A man wouldn't do that.
Dr. Sam Loomis: This isn't a man.

[after Michael falls off the balcony]
Laurie: Was that the boogeyman?
Dr. Sam Loomis: As a matter of fact... it was!

Dr. Sam Loomis: I met him, fifteen years ago. I was told there was nothing left. No reason, no conscience, no understanding; even the most rudimentary sense of life or death, good or evil, right or wrong. I met this six-year-old child, with this blank, pale, emotionless face and, the blackest eyes... the *devil's* eyes! I spent eight years trying to reach him, and then another seven trying to keep him locked up because I realized what was living behind that boy's eyes was purely and simply... *evil*!

Annie Brackett: [Michael Myers's car cruises by the girls walking home from school] Hey, jerk! SPEED KILLS!
[the car screeches to a halt]

Lynda: Now when we get inside, Annie will distract Lindsey and we go upstairs to the first bedroom on the right. Got it?
Bob: First I rip your clothes off...
Lynda: Don't rip my blouse, it's expensive you idiot!
Bob: Then I rip my clothes off, then I rip Lindsey's clothes off, yeah I think I got it.

Dr. Terence Wynn: Now, for God's sake, he can't even drive a car!
Dr. Sam Loomis: He was doing very well last night! Maybe someone around here gave him lessons

Sheriff Leigh Brackett: Well, it's going to take a lot more than fancy talk to keep me up all night crawling around these bushes.
Dr. Sam Loomis: I- I- I watched him for fifteen years, sitting in a room, staring at a wall, not seeing the wall, looking past the wall - looking at this night, inhumanly patient, waiting for some secret, silent alarm to trigger him off. Death has come to your little town, Sheriff. Now you can either ignore it, or you can help me to stop it.
Sheriff Leigh Brackett: More fancy talk.

Dr. Sam Loomis: [pulling his gun after being startled by a crash] You must think me a very sinister doctor... oh, I have a permit.
Sheriff Leigh Brackett: Seems to me you're just plain scared.
Dr. Sam Loomis: Yeah, yeah I am...

Dr. Sam Loomis: You've got to believe me, Officer, he is coming to Haddonfield... Because I know him - I'm his doctor! You must be ready for him... If you don't, it's your funeral!

Lynda: [exposing her breasts] See anything you like?

Dr. Sam Loomis: He came home!

Dr. Sam Loomis: You've fooled them, haven't you Michael? Well, you haven't fooled me.

Lindsey Wallace: I'm scared!
Laurie: There's nothing to be scared of, now get changed.
Tommy Doyle: Are you sure?
Laurie: Yes.
Tommy Doyle: How?
Laurie: I killed him...
Tommy Doyle: [shouts] But you can't kill the boogie man!

Worthless tidbits of info:

Even though the film takes place in Haddonfield Illinois (paritally based on co-writer/long time producer of John Carpenter's Debra Hill) all of the license plates have California on them due to the fact this was such a low budgeted film

The film was shot in 22 days, a remarkably fast effort

No one is clearly listed to have played Myers under the mask, legend has it - evne the director John Carpenter wore the mask for a few scenes

In Frankenstein fashion, Myers is referred to as The Shape, a shape of pure ominious and dark evil as only Loomis can refer to as.

Dario Argento had the gloved killer, Carpenter had the masked killer. It was from viewing a lot of Giallo films that Carpenter got some influence to make his film, and can be quoted about Dario's movies as "they don't make any sense, but he shows death so beautifully"

As noted earlier, Carpenter is also a huge fun of Psycho, one of the main characters in that film is Sam Loomis (the boyfriend of Nancy Curtis in the ffilm). Donald Pleasance character is named after him, and the daughter of the main woman murdered in the shower sequence of Psycho, is the very same Jamie Lee Curtis - the main heroine in this film. And also, the young Tommy Doyle's character's anem is from Hitchcock's Rear Window

The Michale Myers mask was actually a William Shatner mask spray painted white.

The film was shot in the spring in California but takes place in the Fall of Illionis. So the crew had to buy paper leaves and color them Autumn colors and reuse the same leaves over and over again for all of the scenes.

The kids are watching The Thing from Another World, Carpenter would eventually remaked that classic in just a few years with The Thing, too bad E.T made a friendly alien concept a lot better than one to reduplicate and kill you.

Michale Myers has no connection to the man to eventually don the Austin Powers syndrome. In fact, he's named after the international distributor who helped out so much for the European success of Carpenter's previous film in Assualt on Precinct 13.

Leigh Brackett from this film is named after the same screenwriter from Howard Hawk's Rio Bravo, the main inspiration to Assualt on Precinct 13

The film was orignally slated to be called the Babysitter Murders

There is a different cut of the film if you can find it - I actually own one for when the film was originally shown on ABC in the late 70's they needed extra scenes to fill up what gore was cut out (and nudity :( ) Certian cuts incorporate the stuff filmed on tv (such as the unmasked Michael staring at Laurie at the end of the film) and all of the original gore.



Final rudnwon of the film

Breasts seen: 2 pairs

Body count 5

Buckets of blood 3 out of 10- The gorey stuff occurs when a friend's corpse pops down or up outta no where.